lternet did a very respectable and respectful article on the death of Andrew Breitbart. By the end of the article I was ready to puke. The article seemed to go out of its way to avoid mentioning the fact that the biggest headlines of Breitbart's career were all illegitimately cooked up. After all the hoopla, it would come out that he had maliciously twisted the facts so violently that they came out in the wash as nothing more than made up stories in which he exploited innocent people fraudulently to make himself look like a real journalist.
He was not.
Breitbart was a cheap Repuke sock-puppet; and like all mainstream media Repukes: Savage, Beck, Hannity, O'Reilley. etc. he didn't care who he fucked over, or how brazenly he lied, so long as he could squeeze some points and hefty checks out of the most mean spirited right wingers. His attitude was that of an opportunist and a hustler.
As for right wingers, we all know they are colossally mean spirited. Famous for it. David Brock wrote about his epiphany as he talked to a right wing Federal judge who had no shame in displaying the torrent of his mean-spiritedness. Brock had attacked Anita Hill in an article during the Clarence Thomas debacle in Congress with his little phrase, "she was a little bit nutty and a little bit slutty," Although he gained mountains of praise from right wingers, he had qualms about the fact that he had destroyed a good woman without ever even meeting her.
And for what?
For the likes of Clarence Thomas?
Long Dong Silver of the bench?
And that moment of revelation was all it took to launch Brock's departure from the Republicanism for which he had become such a high performing sock-puppet writer, and reclaim the Liberal outlook he had so assiduously fought against at Berkeley.
But the author of this article doesn't really spend time on Brock's recovery of his own sense of decency. Something which Breitbart never troubled himself about. None of them, the conservatives, I mean, cared or care anything about reality so long as they could twist facts into a narrative which would stoke the vast boiling cauldrons of their hatred.■
§
§



ere, in the link below is a passageway to one of the most lucid and well researched essays on the fraudulence perpetrated by the Federal Reserve I have yet seen. If the public knew of how they were being scammed by both government and major banks there would be outrage such as has never been seen. But the propaganda machine keeps on hypnotizing those already deep in slumber from womb to tomb. You certainly won't read of it in any mainstream media. After all, media, all of it, is owned by the banks; hereafter referred to as banksters. The banksters are far worse than the Capone gang in Chicago. You always knew where you stood, or didn't stand, with the mob. Banksters are more like the Wizard of Oz, who stands behind the curtain, pulling the levers of power. They do their best to keep their identity hidden. Who for example, would ever suspect that the Federal Reserve, the bank which likes to give the impression that it is a part of the government, and which prints our very dollars, is not only private, but is owned not by the so-called Board of Directors, but by the Queen of England and the Rothschilds. And they have one and only one mission in mind and that is to turn you and your children and their children into debt slaves. Serfs. Do yourself a big favor and learn something about The Fed:

ny deal which allows big oil to continue with business-as- usual is execrable for us, the citizens of the world, but excellent for big oil and its handmaiden corporations like Halliburton, KBR and the like. 
how hands, please! Who did not know that the International Banksters are the most criminal class on the planet? Those who did not know this need to watch this video. Thom Hartmann is always a pleasure anyways. But here is one of his very most important and insightful reports. Since John Perkins spilled the beans and blew the whistle on the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund the banksters have come out of the closet to show themselves as the criminals they truly are.



eing an independent spirit, and ever loyal in his commitment to America's highest stated ideals, not to mention that he lived a mere two houses down the street from Ralph Waldo Emerson, and the other Transcendentalists, Thoreau found the United States invasion of Mexico and ensuing war with Mexico, so profoundly disgraceful a policy that he could see no option but to protest.